Home / FAQ / LXD vs Docker: Which Should I Choose?

LXD vs Docker: Which Should I Choose?

This is one of the most common questions in the container world. Both are powerful tools, but designed for different purposes. Understanding their core differences is key to making the right choice.

Quick Answer: Which to Choose?

Simply put:

  • Use LXD as "lightweight VMs": When you need a complete, isolated Linux system to run multiple services or build complex development environments, choose LXD.
  • Use Docker as "application packaging tool": When you need to package, distribute, and run single applications (especially microservices), choose Docker.

Core Difference: System Containers vs Application Containers

To understand LXD and Docker, the most important thing is to realize they have different positioning:

  • LXD is a "system container" manager: The containers it creates are like complete virtual machines (VMs), with their own independent operating system, init system (like systemd), users, and services. You can log in, install software, and configure services just like managing a real server. Its goal is to host a complete operating system environment.
  • Docker is an "application container" manager: The containers it creates typically run only a single application or process (e.g., a web server or database). Its design goal is to package and distribute applications with all their dependencies, achieving "build once, run anywhere".
LXD: System Container Host Machine LXD Container (Full OS) /sbin/init (PID 1) sshd nginx database cron Docker: Application Container Host Machine App 1 nginx App 2 database App 3 redis

A Simple Analogy

Think of housing:

  • LXD containers are like apartments: They have independent bedrooms, kitchens, bathrooms, and complete facilities. You can freely arrange your life inside and place various furniture (run multiple services).
  • Docker containers are like hotel rooms: Their main function is to provide a bed (run one core application). While they have supporting facilities, their design purpose is for a clear, single objective.

Detailed Comparison

Feature LXD Docker
Primary Type System Container (OS Container) Application Container
Core Goal Provide a complete, isolated Linux system environment Package, distribute, and run single applications
Isolation Level Very strong, VM-like. Uses user namespaces and other technologies for deep isolation. Strong, process-level isolation. Root user privileges shared by default.
Internal Environment Complete operating system, including init system (systemd), multiple services, multiple users. Usually runs only one foreground process, streamlined to the extreme.
Persistence Persistent by default, runs and maintains long-term like VMs. Usually stateless and ephemeral, data persisted through volumes.
Management Experience Like managing VMs (`lxc exec my-container bash`) Declarative management through Dockerfile and images
Networking Rich network options like bridge, MACVLAN, more like physical networking. Has its own overlay network model, optimized for inter-service communication.

How to Choose?

Choose LXD if...

  • You need a complete, multi-purpose Linux environment.
  • You want to migrate from virtual machines (VMs) but gain container performance and speed.
  • You need to run traditional, non-cloud-native applications.
  • You want to provide developers with isolated, complete development and testing environments.
  • Security is a primary concern, requiring stronger isolation than Docker.

Choose Docker if...

  • You're building microservice-based applications.
  • You need to quickly package, deploy, and scale stateless applications.
  • Your workflow heavily relies on CI/CD automation pipelines.
  • You want to leverage the vast Docker Hub image ecosystem.
  • Your goal is cross-platform application portability.

Conclusion: Not Competitors, but Partners

LXD and Docker are not direct competitors; they solve different problems.

A very common and powerful usage is: running Docker inside LXD containers. This provides you with a completely isolated, resource-controlled environment to run Docker and your application containers. Benefits include:

  • Enhanced Security: Confine Docker engine and containers within LXD's sandbox. Even if Docker has vulnerabilities, they won't affect the host machine.
  • Simplified Management: Package the entire development environment (including code, Docker engine, containers) into one LXD container, easily snapshot, migrate, and replicate.
  • Resource Isolation: Use LXD's CPU, memory, and disk limits to precisely control Docker environment resource consumption.

Ultimately, your choice depends on your specific needs. "Use the right tool for the right job" is the golden rule here.